Finding functional, affordable facilities space is often a challenge for microschool founders. Microschools need to operate in convenient locations for the families they serve. And so that they must allow these nontraditional, innovative small learning environments to operate affordably, especially where their families must budget their tuition monthly, or weekly, they often need to be scrappy in their facilities choices.
Houses of worship house 29 percent of microschools studied nationally. While many are actively involved in the educational programs offered, this is not always the case, and often the classroom space within houses of worship is made available to microschool leaders serving families within and outside their congregation whether or not operated as a function of the ministry.
Private residences, including family farms, are the next most-popular facilities used, at 17 percent, followed by those held inside a private home that is not currently a residence (7 percent), employer-controlled or other donated space and government-controlled space rounds out the list at 4 percent each.
Often, however, microschools are positioned so that it becomes necessary for them to navigate rigid regulatory requirements from local government authorities exercising their control over zoning, land use and business licensing. Even though nonpublic microschools serve just 22 children, on average, fire safety inspectors often expect microschools to install the same types of expensive sprinkler systems as public charter schools serving a thousand students or more. Microschool founders are regularly required to follow bureaucratic, slow and costly procedures to change zoning definition, even when the leases they seek are for terms of three years or less, even requiring they provide architectural drafts which alone can cost over $10,000 – a major expense for a new microschool serving 10 kids from working families paying tuition.